Trade and Human Health and Safety世贸组织下的贸易与健康 azw3 lrf 下载 百度云 夸克云 snb pdf kindle

Developing countries comprise the majority of the membership of the World Trade Organization。 Many developing countries believe that the welfare gains that were supposed to ensue from the establishment of the WTO and the results of the Uruguay Round remain largely elusive。 Though often aggregated under the ubiquitous banner “developing countries，” their multilateral trade objectives —— like their underlying policy interests and the concerns—— vary considerably from country to country and are by no means homogenous。 Coming off the heels of the 9/11 terrorist attacks， the ongoing Doha Development Round， launched in that Middle Eastern city in the fall of 2001 and now on “life support” so to speak， was inaugurated with much fanfare as a means of addressing the difficulties that developing countries face within the multilateral trading system。 Special and differential treatment provisions in the WTO agreement in particular are the focus of much discussion in the ongoing round， and voices for change have been multiplying， due to widespread dissatisfaction with their effectiveness， enforceability， and implementation。

This book gathers papers from distinguished experts discussing how health based trade restrictive measures have fared in WTO case law。 With an analysis of applicable primary law（GATT， TBT， and SPS） and all case law in the area of trade and health， this book offers a comprehensive discussion on the standards established for the regulation of public health and safety issues。 It aims to demonstrate how the world trading regime has come of age and accepted that trade liberalization cannot take place at the expense of nationally defined social values。

Preface to the Series

Introduction Remarks

George A.Bermann and Petros C.Mavroidis

　1 A map of the world trade organization law of domestic regulation of goods

　2　The WTO impact on internal regulations ： a case study of the Canada-EC Asbestos dispute

　3　Reflections on the appellate body decision in the Hormones case and the meaning of the SPS agreement

　4　The Salmon case ： evolution of balancing mechanisms for non-trade values in WTO

　5　Lotus eaters ： reflections on the Varietals dispute， the SPS agreement and WTO dispute resolution

　6　Regulatory purpose and “like products” in article Ⅲ ： 4 of the GATT （with additional remarks on article Ⅲ ： 2）

　7　The WTO standard of review in health and safety disputes

　8　Expert advice in WTO dispute settlement

　9　Domestic regulation， sovereignty and scientific evidence requirements ： a pessimistic view

　10　Time for a United Nations' “global compact“ for integrating human rights into the law of Worldwide Organizations ： lessons from European integration law for global integration law

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Trade and Human Health and Safety世贸组织下的贸易与健康在线阅读

在线听书地址：Trade and Human Health and Safety世贸组织下的贸易与健康在线收听

在线购买地址：Trade and Human Health and Safety世贸组织下的贸易与健康在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

书籍介绍

Developing countries comprise the majority of the membership of the World Trade Organization. Many developing countries believe that the welfare gains that were supposed to ensue from the establishment of the WTO and the results of the Uruguay Round remain largely elusive. Though often aggregated under the ubiquitous banner “developing countries,” their multilateral trade objectives -- like their underlying policy interests and the concerns -- vary considerably from country to country and are by no means homogenous. Coming off the heels of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the ongoing Doha Development Round, launched in that Middle Eastern city in the fall of 2001 and now on “life support” so to speak, was inaugurated with much fanfare as a means of addressing the difficulties that developing countries face within the multilateral trading system. Special and differential treatment provisions in the WTO agreement in particular are the focus of much discussion in the ongoing round, and voices for change have been multiplying, due to widespread dissatisfaction with their effectiveness, enforceability, and implementation.